From: ericawd (ericawd@mem.quik.com)
Date: 09/17/02-06:23:31 AM Z
Thanks,
Candace Spearman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Gerling" <keithgerling@att.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 9:41 PM
Subject: RE: Achieving detail with gum
> Original was 2 1/4 T-Max 100.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ericawd [mailto:ericawd@mem.quik.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:15 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Achieving detail with gum
>
>
> And what was the source of the original camera neg./pos.? 4x5? 2 1/4?
35mm?
> other?
>
> C. Spearman
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keith Gerling" <keithgerling@att.net>
> To: "Alt-Photo-Process-L" <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM
> Subject: Achieving detail with gum
>
>
> > There was some discussion recently concerning detail in gum printing.
> I've
> > figured out the trick to maximizing detail: make the prints big! Here
are
> > two links to jpeg captures of a recent project.
> >
> > Gum on Aluminum (4 coats for the top panel, 6 for the bottom panel)
> >
> > First the complete work, which is a diptych measuring 72"x30":
> > http://s16v.com/keith/teddy.jpg
> >
> > Here is a detail shot of an area measuring 8.5"x11.5":
> > http://s16v.com/keith/teddy%20detail.jpg
> >
> > Thanks for looking,
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 10/01/02-03:47:09 PM Z CST
