Thanks everyone for the comments!
Dwayne
>a flatbed vs. a true slide scanner or a drum scan. Am I going to be losing
>anything here?
>> Thanks,
>> Dwayne
>
>Hi Dwayne,
> For the purpose of gum, a flatbed scan is just fine. I am getting
>everything that is on the neg in my gum print, and sometimes it looks so
>sharp that it looks like a normal print. When I have thought that the
>scanner was screwing up, upon taking a loupe to my neg, the screwup was on
>the neg already. I don't know what price the scanner you are talking about
>is, but the Epson 3200 is a charm. However, I had previously scanned stuff
>on an $80 Microtek scanner from Costco and that worked OK enough, too, for
>gum negs.
> I have been scanning stuff to print out on 20x30 inch Fuji Crystal
>Archive prints, and you would not know they are digital negs. That is, from
>an Epson 3200. I output it at 250 dpi to the service bureau, JPEG format,
>because they downsize the print to 250 anyway, even though you'd think that
>300 or 360 would be better.
>Chris
Received on Fri Dec 19 07:36:04 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/02/04-09:36:33 AM Z CST