jeffbuck@swcp.com
Date: 01/09/03-04:59:02 PM Z
Thanks, Carl. -jb
Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net> said:
> Jeff,
>
> Oxalic seems to be a good idea for this paper. Definite increase in dmax,
> though most of the difference shows up in the fully black border. Actual
> image tones aren't affected that much and a masked print may not really need
> the pre-treatment. It requires an acid clearing bath: in EDTA/sulfite the
> image area clears but the entire sheet takes on a yellow cast (from the
> developer?) that needs acid clearing to go back to the original white. 2%
> citric does the trick.---Carl
>
> --
> web site with picture galleries
> and workshop information at:
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~cweese/
>
> ----------
> >From: jeffbuck@swcp.com
> >To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> >Subject: Stonehenge Paper
> >Date: Thu, Jan 9, 2003, 3:49 PM
> >
>
> > Stonehenge was mentioned frequently in a thread last week or so. Do those
who
> > use it pre-treat w/ oxalic acid? Also, is there any difference between
using
> > the "front" or the "back", aside from the visible difference in texture?
> > Thanks. -jb
> >
>
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 02/21/03-10:44:16 AM Z CST