From: Stuart W Melvin (swmelvin@earthlink.net)
Date: 07/25/03-10:22:18 AM Z
Katherine,
You may have said this before. But I'm sure you will agree that others have
spoken to the contrary. This is NOT a persoal attack so you really souldn't
take it as such. I believe if you check below Dick's statement reads
"counter to much" NOT "counter to all". Congradulations on your recognition
of application of pigment. I think the more that is said about this the more
likley it is that someone picking up the brush for the first time is aided.
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Katharine Thayer [mailto:kthayer@pacifier.com]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:51 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Gum Pigments
Richard Sullivan wrote:
>
> One thing that Stuart said that goes counter to much popular opinion is
> that any brand of pigment works. I found that interesting.
>
> --Dick Sullivan
This is what I've said and said and said and said, both on this list and
on the Bostick & Sullivan list, so many many times that it's just
impossible for me to believe that this seems like a brand new idea to
anyone. I'm probably about as annoyed right now as Dave was the other
night, or even more so, so I'd probably better shut up right now, except
to say that you're not helping this discussion, Dick, by continuing to
throw more of this hype in, as if everything Melvin says or does is
something no one has ever said or done thought before. It's not, okay?
So please just stop it.
Katharine Thayer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 08/07/03-03:34:50 PM Z CST