Re: Gum Pigments

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Sandy King (sanking@clemson.edu)
Date: 07/27/03-01:45:06 PM Z


Katharine,

My remark was not directed at you. It was made in a specific context
of a reply to a message from Dick Sullivan in which the offending
party was clearly identified.

I have no quarrel at all with your exchanges on this issue.

Sandy

>Sandy King wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> I am offended by the obvious hostility being directed at Stuart.
>
>Having played some part in this, I want to make it abundantly and
>finally clear that my objection was to the hyperbole and to the fomentor
>of the hyperbole, which Stuart was not responsible for and did not
>participate in. My comments were simply an attempt to place Stuart's
>accomplishment in some kind of reasonable context and perspective,
>certainly not an attack on Stuart, his work, his methods, or anything
>else about him. He's a great guy; he's learned gum well; I have no
>quarrel with him whatever.
>kt


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 08/07/03-03:34:51 PM Z CST