From: Tor-Einar Jarnbjo (tor-einar@jarnbjo.de)
Date: 06/02/03-03:40:48 PM Z
> Given the likely volume of lenses made the list makes
> sense but the age given by phone does not.
> I suspect the lady at Rodenstock either got the number
> wrong or read the list wrong. Perhaps an extra digit got
> inserted. If she interpreted the serial number as, say,
> 370023, the 1930 date would be right. I strongly suspect
> this is what happened.
The estimate was based on the lens type/brand and not on the serial number.
But of course, the man may have made a mistake. I would also have dated the
lens much older than 1930 based on the "look", but who knows. Perhaps
someone here knows anything about this Bistigmat 13x18cm large format lens?
Tor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 07/09/03-08:31:13 AM Z CST