Re: First Gum Print

FotoDave@aol.com
Date: 03/07/03-03:57:04 PM Z

• Next message: Hamish Stewart: "Re: First Gum Print"
• Previous message: Neil Miller: "Re: lets make this clear(was re success !)"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Buffaloe: "First Gum Print"
• Next in thread: Ed Buffaloe: "Re: First Gum Print"
• Reply: Ed Buffaloe: "Re: First Gum Print"

Did you use a step tablet? If you did and nothing showed, the problem is
unlikely exposure. With a density range of 3.0, you could overexpose 1000
times and still see some scale.

Dave S

> My first gum print is here:
>
> http://unblinkingeye.com/Photographs/Misc/FirstGum.jpg
>
> The contrast is good, but I may have overexposed it a bit. Any
> suggestions?
>

• Next message: Hamish Stewart: "Re: First Gum Print"
• Previous message: Neil Miller: "Re: lets make this clear(was re success !)"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Buffaloe: "First Gum Print"
• Next in thread: Ed Buffaloe: "Re: First Gum Print"
• Reply: Ed Buffaloe: "Re: First Gum Print"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 04/22/03-02:37:24 PM Z CST