Grafist@aol.com
Date: 03/12/03-04:45:24 AM Z
In a message dated 10/03/03 16:48:40 GMT Standard Time, mjkoskin@koti.soon.fi
writes:
> now the test strip I
> made had the shortest exposure of 10 mins and this resulted one hour of
> soaking in water to get a decent print. My lamp is 100 W blended light
> lamp, so with a good uv-source the time may be really short.
..........................................................
Hi Matti,
10 mins seems a reasonable time to get a decent print.
Respectfully,what is to be gained by shortening exposure, except a few
minutes? A longer exposure time gives a greater scale of times when wishing
to adjust for negatives of varying density.
Could you please clarify the information posted by Chris, where she
mentions you, about exposures ``without`` using sensitizer?
Thanks. John- Photographist- London
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 04/22/03-02:37:25 PM Z CST