From: Christina Z. Anderson (zphoto@montana.net)
Date: 03/15/03-03:01:21 PM Z
OHHHH, thanks Dave. That makes *total* sense. BTW, I'm back from Moab
(beautiful weather and picture making possibilities) and plowing thru 176
emails, but I'm THRILLED, along with Lisa Reddig, that the gum discussion
has been going on.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: <FotoDave@aol.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Zimmerman process
> Chris,
>
> They are referring to the exposure range rather than the density range of
the
> final print, so by "short scale" they mean the contrast range of the
negative
> must be low).
>
> Dave S
>
> > Most of the books say gum is a "short scale" process. I can never
> > figure that out, because i get a fully tonal image with gum that
certainly
> > doesn't bug me.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 04/22/03-02:37:25 PM Z CST