From: Darryl Baird (dbaird@umflint.edu)
Date: 03/31/03-09:09:32 AM Z
Yes, I saw some of this work (same photographer?) at the Canon Gallery
at the V&A. It was mounted on a wall... really amazing. My students
were knocked out by just the concept alone. Talk about image "depth."
Darryl
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 10:04 AM, Paul Martinez wrote:
> Actually there is a photographer/gardner in the UK (I
> think) that "prints" on turf grass. The guy projects
> negatives onto grass under some sort of tent and the
> areas that get light turn green, while the areas in
> shadow get yellowed out.
>
>
> --- Bill Collins <photo@intrex.net> wrote:
>> I suppose you could tape a negative to the roof of
>> your car and find an image in the faded paint
>> underneath after a decade or so! Is moss growing on
>> the North side of a tree (South in the southern
>> hemisphere) a photographic process?
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> ---------- Original Message
>> ----------------------------------
>> From: Phillip Murphy <pmurf@bellsouth.net>
>> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 16:52:58 -0600
>>
>>> It would be curious to see a list of slowest
>> alt-photo processes. Not that one
>>> can not drag these
>>> processes out ( example would be many many layers
>> in building an image). But a
>>> list of process insensitivity to
>>> actinic light would interesting.
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 04/22/03-02:37:26 PM Z CST