From: David Harris (david.j.harris2@ntlworld.com)
Date: 03/31/03-09:15:30 AM Z
How does he fix the image?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darryl Baird" <dbaird@umflint.edu>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: Slowest development / was Re: emergency question regarding
cyanotype
> Yes, I saw some of this work (same photographer?) at the Canon Gallery
> at the V&A. It was mounted on a wall... really amazing. My students
> were knocked out by just the concept alone. Talk about image "depth."
>
> Darryl
>
> On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 10:04 AM, Paul Martinez wrote:
>
> > Actually there is a photographer/gardner in the UK (I
> > think) that "prints" on turf grass. The guy projects
> > negatives onto grass under some sort of tent and the
> > areas that get light turn green, while the areas in
> > shadow get yellowed out.
> >
> >
> > --- Bill Collins <photo@intrex.net> wrote:
> >> I suppose you could tape a negative to the roof of
> >> your car and find an image in the faded paint
> >> underneath after a decade or so! Is moss growing on
> >> the North side of a tree (South in the southern
> >> hemisphere) a photographic process?
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> ---------- Original Message
> >> ----------------------------------
> >> From: Phillip Murphy <pmurf@bellsouth.net>
> >> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> >> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 16:52:58 -0600
> >>
> >>> It would be curious to see a list of slowest
> >> alt-photo processes. Not that one
> >>> can not drag these
> >>> processes out ( example would be many many layers
> >> in building an image). But a
> >>> list of process insensitivity to
> >>> actinic light would interesting.
> >>
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 04/22/03-02:37:26 PM Z CST