Re: Re: Photogravure question

From: res1dvao@verizon.net
Date: 11/06/03-02:14:45 PM Z
Message-id: <20031106201446.WKIH1313.out005.verizon.net@outgoing.verizon.net>

I make a good print in Photoshop, put it on a disk, and have a OHP trans made at Kinko's for $1.00. I use the new silicone plate and this combo makes great prints.
>
> From: sstoney@pdq.net
> Date: 2003/11/02 Sun AM 08:41:34 CST
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Photogravure question
>
> I use photopolymer plates too. I have digital transparencies made by a
> pre-press guy. He uses Icefields to put a random stochastic screening in
> that makes the plate grab the ink. The most problematic thing was
> developing a curve to apply to the digitized image and convincing the
> pre-press guy to stop messing with the curve! Once you do that, it's
> country simple.
>
> --shannon
>
> >> I skipped copper and went to photopolymer right away, the only
> >> consistent problem was getting even blacks and detailed shadows. I
> >> couldn't get the ink to "grab" anything and would tend to wipe these
> >> areas too hard, escpecially if they were large. I learned my film
> >> positives were too contrasty (too dense in the shadows) and cut back
> >> my overall density, nothing darker than about an 80% black.
> >>
> >> also, it has been nearly five years since I inked a plate, but I still
> >> have plates, ink, and access to a press... I guess I'm officially
> >> still in the game.
> >>
> >> Describe your "failures," please.
> >>
> >> Darryl
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 6 16:26:12 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/04/03-05:18:02 PM Z CST