From: Eric Neilsen (e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net)
Date: 10/04/03-10:10:05 AM Z
Tech # 1-800-367-6434 x 127 in Seattle.
Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Catherine Rogers [mailto:crogers@mpx.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 5:05 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: help with Imacon scanner needed please
John,
I really enjoyed your note! Thanks. Despite my despair it really made me
laugh.
But you don't seem to have solved the Imacon problem either. Amazing really
given how much the thing costs. I just wanted to be able to scan larger
medium format like 6 x 9cm and 6 x 17cm negs among other things which a
nikon ED doesn't do. I feel like a big sucker.
Meanwhile I'll see if there is any reply from the Imacon makers. Maybe it
runs better on a Mac. Also, I'll try it with all the lights off - I NEVER
thought of that one! Maybe we could try a class action which unites the US
and Australia.....
All the best with your praying and chanting and reading.
Thanks again,
Catherine
Catherine,
I have the very same model, the Flextight Photo, and have experienced many
of the same problems, including tabby hair (Go to
Preferences/Imacon/Peculiarities/Dermatological/Hair, and make sure that
Tabby is NOT checked to fix this one).
I had no idea that the grey lines of garbage were caused by static
electricity--thank you for that explanation.
I have found (on a Windows device, mind you--I've never even hooked it up to
any of our Macs) that a re-install of the software has favorable results on
getting it to even turn on and be recognized by the computer (which is, as I
understand it, important to scanning). Every time I want to start it up, I
re-install the software.
I have also found that reading the 25th Anniversary Edition of Zen and the
Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Persig (sp?) helped me stare at the
menu choices until I could grok the settings for each individual scan while
attempting to square and load the negatives into the magnetic carrier with
no help at all from the built in light table (which is never quite
convenient while loading negatives in to the aforementioned magnetic
carrier. . . right?).
I then close out all other programs (this being, as I mentioned, a Windows
device) and scan at the highest resolution gleaned from the groking
mentioned in the previous paragraph. Then I turn out all the lights, fire up
some incense, and fall onto my prayer blanket chanting " Imacon, Imacon,
Imacon. . . " (just that way, including the italics).
Several hours later I have occasionally managed to get a full set of decent
medium format scans. In the meantime I have usually batch-scanned several
dozen rolls of 120 film at higher resolutions through my MicroTek 9800XL,
and have edited those babies out for printing.
Mostly what I like about the Imacon is the way it sits on the counter in our
production space, not plugged in or hooked up to a computer at all--the way
it just sits there looking important in its Imacon-ness! God, that's
beautiful.
If it were more than two of us, I would suggest a class action.
I hope this helps, but I know better
--John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 11/05/03-09:22:17 AM Z CST