Re: neo-Pictorialism

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Kate Mahoney (kateb@paradise.net.nz)
Date: 10/05/03-02:18:08 PM Z


Arrrggghhh! Mark you always come up with something controversial...tho on second thoughts why angels should be controversial is a whole other can of worms......have you seen the baby photos of N.Z. photographer (oh damn now her name eludes me....) anyway they're very much in this area.....only with babies!!!

Kate
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ender100@aol.com
  To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
  Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:32 AM
  Subject: Re: neo-Pictorialism

  Shannon,

  Don't forget the photos of angels or people with wings glued on their backs! heheheheeh

  Mark Nelson

  In a message dated 10/5/03 7:46:23 AM, sstoney@pdq.net writes:

    You know, soft focus,
    vignetting, romantic subject matter (sometimes), fooling with the
    negative, alternative processes, interest in dreams, memories, and
    visions as opposed to just the hard-edged, scientific, f64 world out
    there. This is an over-simplification but you get the drift.


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 11/05/03-09:22:17 AM Z CST