From: Sandy King (sanking@CLEMSON.EDU)
Date: 10/16/03-12:10:59 PM Z
Perry wrote:
>Well with the research that I've done I'd say that the 1280 is a better
>printer for printing digital negs because their ink has greater density.
I wonder if you might share that research with us. I seriously doubt
that you can get as much density with the regular inks of the 1280 as
with the pigmented inks of the 2000P and 2200.
I have measured an actual UV printing density of over log 3.6 with
the pigmented inks of the Epson 2000P, and I am confident that you
could get as much density with the 2200. If anyone has been able to
get that kind of density with the 1280 the news sure missed me. My
understanding was that people were having to resort to spectral
negatives with the 1280 to get enough effective density range to
print with alt processes like pt/pd.
Sandy King
>
>> From: Trevor Thomsen <secdev@mweb.co.zw>
>> Organization: Security Devices - Harare - Zimbabwe
>> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:49:50 +0200
>> To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>> Subject: Re: Digital cyanotype negs
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you to everyone for sharing all this information on A-P-P.
>>
>> Is the Epson 2200 the best printer to buy for producing digital negs? I
>> have my doubts after reading all the messages recently.
>>
>> Please advise.
>>
>> Trevor Thomsen.
>> Zimbabwe.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Perry" <perry@vivalarevolution.com>
>> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: Digital cyanotype negs
>>
>>
>>> The 1280 uses different inks and they have more density, but It is
>> possible
>>> that using different colors would work. I'm going to give it a try.
>>>
>>>> From: shannon stoney <sstoney@pdq.net>
>>>> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:05:15 -0500
>>>> To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Digital cyanotype negs
>>>>
>>>>> I just recently started making digital negs for my cyanotypes on the
>> 2200
>>>>> and I haven't been able to build up enough density in the blacks to get
>> a
>>>>> good white in my prints. Anyone have any suggestions for me as to what
>> I
>>>>> could do to try and get denser blacks for better whites in my prints?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don't know if Rocky is still on this list, but we saw some cyanotypes
>>>> he had made from digital negs and they looked great. His digital
>>>> negs were printed in orange rather than black on the 1280 I think.
>>>> Maybe if you tried orange? I think Dan calls these "spectral density"
>>>> negatives.
>>>>
>>>> --shannon
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 11/05/03-09:22:18 AM Z CST