From: Dchiap2 (dchiap2@msn.com)
Date: 09/08/03-07:09:23 PM Z
They did hand inspect my film and take it out of the xray bag. I still
like to use them on the chance that some "insistent" person will run
them through the machine anyway. They say that the machines won't
affect the film, but they say a lot of things and I'd rather be as safe
as I can than sorry about some ruined or off film.
Don Chiappinelli, LCSW
dchiap@msn.com
(540)370-4344
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Walker [mailto:walker@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:09 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: RE: flying....
Regarding X-ray bags... On the older machines they tell you that they
won't
expose the film under 400 ASA. If you put them in X-ray bags and it
obscures
the image as it goes through the machine they turn up the intensity of
the
x-ray to get a picture through the bag which is worse.
In Detroit they now have machines that are so strong that there are
signs
telling you that your film WILL be exposed if left in the luggage. They
were
happy to hand inpect which means they open every 35mm canister and swab
it
with a cloth which they then check in a machine for ionic residue from
explosive chemicals.
In other airports (recently) I have been refused hand inspection and
they
put it through the machine (older type) as a matter of policy. Then
again I
have had just the regular hand inpection as well.
I always carry my film with in a ziplock and try my best to work with
the
inspectors to keep it out of the machines.
Scott.
-----Original Message-----
From: epona [mailto:acolyta@napc.com]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:53 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: flying....
X-ray bags? where do i get those??????
thx,
~christine
Dchiap2 wrote:
>I flew to Italy last September via Amsterdam; I hand carried all my
film
>(pola 55, 120 tmax 100 and 400, and 120 color neg) in xray bags, and
had
>it hand inspected. No problems at all, and no rudeness; actually
anyone
>who hand inspected it seemed nicely curious about photography and what
I
>was doing. But it's probably just about who is actually on duty for
>hand inspecting any given day. The downside is that if you have a lot
>of film it can be cumbersome to lug around the airport etc.
>
>Re: Scotland - Sweetheart Abbey, and Castle Campbell stand out it my
>mind, as does Edinburgh and the small towns just south of Edinburgh.
>
>Don Chiappinelli, LCSW
>dchiap@msn.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: epona [mailto:acolyta@napc.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:26 PM
>To: the gurus
>Subject: flying....
>
>Hello folks,
>
>Hope you are all well. I'm flying to Ireland next week and I was
>wondering if you all had any advice about film and security. I shoot
>type 55 which is rather slow (50 asa) and may make it through the
x-rays
>
>but I wasn't sure how much worse things may have gotten post 9/11.
>Caryy on and insist hand-checking? Or pack with luggage? I hear they
>X-ray that as well....
>
>Thanks,
>Christine
>
>
>
--
The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made
for
humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created
for
men.
~ Alice Walker
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 10/01/03-03:09:00 PM Z CST