Re: There is H2O and then there is H2O

From: Jeff Foster, CCS Open System Group (jfoster@uclink.berkeley.edu)
Date: 09/16/03-11:03:59 AM Z

• Next message: mike davey: "RE: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• Previous message: Halvor: "Re: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• In reply to: Halvor: "Re: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• Next in thread: mike davey: "RE: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• Reply: mike davey: "RE: There is H2O and then there is H2O"

FWIW:

heavy water is
D2O
hydrogen replaced with deuterium.

Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Halvor" <halvorb@mac.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: There is H2O and then there is H2O

> Sorry I should not have answered that way
>
> Heavy water is sometimes incorectly written as H3O (as I probably picked
it
> up it some time ago back in Norway), I do not have time right now to check
> it up completely but probably some thing to do with the way heavy hydrogen
> is supposed to be written with neutron number over proton number or the
> isotop of hydrogen tritium...
>
> anyway of topic and sorry Nick Makris for messing up your question.
>
> Halvor
>

• Next message: mike davey: "RE: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• Previous message: Halvor: "Re: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• In reply to: Halvor: "Re: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• Next in thread: mike davey: "RE: There is H2O and then there is H2O"
• Reply: mike davey: "RE: There is H2O and then there is H2O"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 10/01/03-03:09:00 PM Z CST