Re: HP5+ for alternative processes

From: LCFSHEEN@aol.com
Date: 04/02/04-08:09:02 PM Z
Message-id: <11a.30658fcf.2d9f76be@aol.com>

In a message dated 03/04/2004 02:33:34 GMT Standard Time, sanking@clemson.edu
writes:

> I question the credibility of any so-called objective tests produced by
> "the group of us" who have in their own words already concluded that the
> combination of FP4 and amidol has been "found to be probably the best developer
> for alternative processes

Sandy

They will be objective.

M
Received on Fri Apr 2 20:09:34 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/14/04-02:14:30 PM Z CST