Re: Sodium Bisulfite

From: gdimase@hotmail.com
Date: 08/24/04-05:18:15 PM Z
Message-id: <BAY8-DAV58o4d7iqPLz00000617@hotmail.com>

You mean if the print dries totally the clearing process will not work?
Giovanni

----- Original Message -----
Wrom: UZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRES
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: Sodium Bisulfite

> Why Sodium Bisuphite? I always use Potassium Metabisulphate - the stain
> goes away in a few moments in most cases -the only trouble I ever had
> was not letting the prints dry before clearing.
> Kate
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Wrom: KPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBGDADRZFSQHYUCDDJ
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 August 2004 4:50 a.m.
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Sodium Bisulfite
>
> Hi Katharine,
> I assume the sodium bisulfite is on a 12% concentration.
> How much time you put the picture in the bath?
> An the you bath it again in a water bath, for how long?
> What about stubborn cases? You keep it longer?
> Let me give you a recent example of what happened to me:
> I was working on a full color print, this picture has an open clean
> white
> sky therefore the negative section of the sky is totally black.
> I did my first cyano print and everything was fine (sorry I sized the
> day
> before first with gelatin and glyoxal).
> I go next day for my Blue channel and yellow pigment and the sky comes
> out
> "yellow", I thought it was stained, next day I did my Green channel and
> magenta pigment and I got a beautiful picture but with the yellow sky
> (as I
> said out of a black negative).
> I wash it with sodium bisulfite and the stain is still there.
> Yes, I know I can create a new negative and paint the sky on white but I
> want to know what may have happened.
> Thanks,
> Giovanni
> ----- Original Message -----
> Wrom: ZRCLBDXRQBGJSNBOHMKHJYFMYXOEAIJJPHSCRTNHG
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Sodium Bisulfite
>
>
> > Martin Angerman wrote:
> > >
> > > The sulfite acts as a reducing agent. It clears the dichromate by
> reducing
> > > it to an inactive form.
> >
> > Hmm. I've always wondered just what a clearing agent does, chemically,
> > but this explanation doesn't work very well for me, since what is
> called
> > "dichromate stain" in my experience almost always consists of Cr+3 not
> > Cr+6. I tried a few years ago to introduce a new name here for the
> stain
> > to reflect this reality, but had little luck with this campaign and
> gave
> > it up after a while.
> >
> > Except for unusual cases where a peculiar combination of sizing and/or
> > paper hangs onto the bright yellow dichromate and won't let it go, the
> > hexavalent dichromate, being very soluble, almost invariably washes
> out
> > in the developing water without additional clearing needed. It's the
> > less soluble reduced chromium species that comprise a tan, brown, or
> > green stain that must be removed to clear the print. I don't know what
> > the clearing agent does to the reduced chromium to get rid of it, but
> > the point is that the chromium in the stain is already reduced before
> > the clearing agent is introduced, and that we've just confused
> ourselves
> > by calling this reduced-chromium stain a "dichromate stain."
> >
> > It's true that the same clearing agent works for both the less typical
> > dichromate stain and the usual reduced-chromium stain, (except for
> very
> > heavily overexposed prints that are so stained that sulfuric acid may
> be
> > needed to clear them) but I'm not sure what that means in terms of
> what
> > happens chemically.
> >
> > At any rate, my own experience is that sodium bisulfite can be re-used
> > many times without diminishing its effectiveness. I had a gallon of it
> > mixed up years ago that I used for 3 or 4 years before it stopped
> > working. I only need to clear very occasionally, so the number of
> > prints that were cleared with that gallon over the 3 or 4 years was
> > rather small, perhaps 12 or 15 at the most, but it would have been a
> > waste of materials and money to mix up new stuff each time, when the
> old
> > stuff was fine for re-use.
> >
> > You know you need a new batch when the solution loses its pungency of
> > odor; in my experience that happens comcomitantly with loss of ability
> > to clear effectively.
> >
> > I no longer keep a big jug of clearing agent around, because I've
> > learned that immersing the paper in the clearing bath is only
> necessary
> > in odd cases such as the sizing/paper problem mentioned above or when
> > I've accidentally spilled some dichromate on the coating table and not
> > noticed it and it's soaked into the back of a piece of paper. But for
> > simply clearing an image, I've found that simply brushing the clearing
> > agent on the image works well, and then a short dip in water is all
> > that's needed to rinse it out of the print, whereas when the paper is
> > immersed, you need a more extended soak to make sure you've got the
> > stuff out of the paper. So now I just keep a pint mixed instead of a
> > gallon, but that pint is as fresh and effective today as it was when I
> > mixed it months ago; the extra air in the liter bottle that I keep it
> in
> > doesn't seem to affect it at all.
> >
> > Katharine Thayer
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Air can also oxidize sulfite to sulfate, ruining it as a clearing
> agent.
> > > Therefore, I would not recommend storing it for more than a day.
> Going
> from
> > > Saturday to Sunday would probably be OK, however.
> > >
> > > My thoughts would be similar to reusing glyoxal and over-using
> fixer.
> The
> > > sulfite (and others) are relatively cheap, particularly compared to
> your
> > > time and other materials. How many people would dilute platinum
> salts
> or
> > > short a mixture of good pigment in gum printing, just to save money?
> The
> > > same applies to the rest of the process.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Wrom: SWZIDREXCAXZOWCONEUQZAAFXISHJEXXIM
> > > To: "AltPhoto" <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> > > Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 7:06 AM
> > > Subject: Sodium Bisulfite
> > >
> > > > After clearing a 2 or 3 gum prints, is the sodium bisulfite
> solution
> > > > storable for later use or should I just dump it and make a new
> solution
> > > > when needed? Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Darryl M. Gage
> > > > Forestville, NY
> > > >
> > > > "Strange and beautiful are the stars tonight..." Blue Rodeo
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 11/08/2004
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 11/08/2004
>
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 24 18:10:00 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 09/14/04-09:18:00 AM Z CST