Re: And how sharp I am was/Re: Temperaprint & Gum

From: shannon stoney ^lt;sstoney@pdq.net>
Date: 02/02/04-08:00:55 AM Z
Message-id: <a05210601bc4407a95710@[66.94.134.248]>

>
>Sandy, are you in league with Shannon? Or the devil?

Really, the distinction is academic. How pedantic. The devil and I are one.

--shannon
Received on Mon Feb 2 08:02:15 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dave Rose: "Re: Only fifty photogs working with platinotype/palladiotype!?"
Previous message: Joe Smigiel: "RE: Only fifty photogs working with platinotype/palladiotype!?"
In reply to: Judy Seigel: "Re: And how sharp I am was/Re: Temperaprint & Gum"
Next in thread: pete: "Re: And how sharp I am was/Re: Temperaprint & Gum"
Reply: pete: "Re: And how sharp I am was/Re: Temperaprint & Gum"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/02/04-11:35:07 AM Z CST