Re: And how sharp I am was/Re: Temperaprint & Gum

From: pete ^lt;temperaprint@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: 02/02/04-10:34:00 AM Z
Message-id: <BC442C78.4F93%temperaprint@blueyonder.co.uk>

--shannon

No you are not I am

Pete ;--<<

>>
>> Sandy, are you in league with Shannon? Or the devil?
>
> Really, the distinction is academic. How pedantic. The devil and I are one.
>
> --shannon
Received on Mon Feb 2 14:14:18 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Loris Medici: "Some temperaprint questions - beware! these are dummy, beginners questions"
Previous message: Dave Rose: "Re: Only fifty photogs working with platinotype/palladiotype!?"
In reply to: shannon stoney: "Re: And how sharp I am was/Re: Temperaprint & Gum"
Next in thread: Ender100@aol.com: "Re: And how sharp I am was/Re: Temperaprint & Gum"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/02/04-11:35:07 AM Z CST