Re: Polymer Plate 80% screen Weirdness Solved!

From: Kate Mahoney ^lt;kateb@paradise.net.nz>
Date: 02/17/04-01:59:49 PM Z
Message-id: <006a01c3f590$99c92d60$6d26f6d2@yourif5zypd2xn>

Plate tone is a matter of taste - with photographic images, plate tone might
well be the thing that announces your work as a gravure rather than another
process.
Kate
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Lybrook" <jon@terabear.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: Polymer Plate 80% screen Weirdness Solved!

> Baird, Darryl wrote:
> > As to these having the "quality" of no plate tone, I'd submit that
> > quality is relative to the experience of the user. Wiping plates is
> > one of the skills we acquire when using ink on any plates. Your
> > mileage may vary...
> >
>
> Thanks for the links Darryl.
>
> With the right person wiping I'm sure plate tone can be minimized if not
> eliminated entirely with conventional plates, if desired. My instructor
is a
> big fan of plate tone, but I am not -- at least not until I get better
control.
> The nature of my subject matter involves 'happy accidents', but I'm not
ready
> to introduce it into the printing process just yet. There are enough
random
> hurdles (including Newton Rings) for now.
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 17 14:00:04 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/02/04-11:35:09 AM Z CST