The labs name is Duggal. http://www.duggal.com/ I have worked
with them
and they are very professional. There is even a tech tip section
for Scala
on their page.
I believe there is another lab in Florida, however your could
find that out
on the Agfa page. For the platinums I have used AGFA NP31 (which
is nomore)
however I plan to try the BPFB-18 w/Dektol about 1:2.
Brian Casey
-----Original Message-----
From: jamesromeo [mailto:jamesromeo@mac.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:07 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Agfa Scala film: how to develop??
I have used it in the past. It must be done at a lab. Dagal spelled
wrong here in the city does it and they import it.
You can buy mailing envelop to send it to the lab. B@H used to sell
them of not the lab does.
A number of years ago I shot my daughter wending color and Scala. she
wanted some platinum prints.I used the Scale ti make 8x10 negs. she was
very happy with the platinum prints. James
>
> Hi Bert, I hope everything's good for you.
>
> Isn't Scala a transparency film? I don't know the proprietary process
> but I think it should consist of some kind of develop / bleach / fog /
> re-develop steps... I don't get the information provided in massive
> development chart; I guess that method will give you a negative, not a
> positive (if it works).
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <curzon@tegenlicht.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 1:17 AM
> Subject: Agfa Scala film: how to develop??
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a fan of Agfa Scala slide film. I'm told it isn't possible to
>> develop the slides myself. There is a good lab nearby that I use. But
>> they told me they're gonna quit on Scala.
>>
>> So I was wondering: is it possible to develop Scala myself as a B&W
> negative
>> film?
>> On http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html you'll find: Rodinal
>> (1+20) at 200 Asa for 8 minutes at 18°C.
>>
>> Has anyone done this? How did it work out? Was there (too) much
>> contrast
> or
>> just the opposite?
>
>
Received on Sat Jun 12 08:26:13 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 07/02/04-09:40:14 AM Z CST