RE: Digital Carbon Negatives

From: Don Bryant ^lt;dstevenbryant@mindspring.com>
Date: 03/07/04-07:00:02 PM Z
Message-id: <000001c404a8$b2fcdf30$210110ac@donspc>

Michael,

>
> One of the reasons I will be trying to develop in PMK is the 'edge
> effects'
> that I love when using that developer.
>

Then you should try semi-stand development with Pyrocat-HD. There has
been a long discussion about this on the AZO forum at Michael A. Smith
and Paula Chamlee's web site.

Sandy King and others have had some amazing results with this method of
development.
 
> I have had good success printing in gelatin silver with PMK negs, and
also
> limited experience in printing PT/PD with PMK (only one print so far).
>

PMK will work pretty well with S.G. papers, I've developed a lot of film
in PMK.

> Years ago I was making my own carbon tissue, and quite a bit of it,
had a
> blast doing everything from 35mm negs up to 8x10 carbons. Loved it to
> death.
>

Then you are well ahead of the curve there.

> Please, if you feel that the PMK negs will be totally detrimental, say
so.
> I am certainly not beyond taking others experiences to ease my
learning
> curve.
>

Okay, I'll say it, don't use PMK for UV printing, instead if you wish to
use a staining developer try W2D2, Pyrocat-HD, or Rollo-Pyro (a modified
PMK formula used for drum processing). Depending on your film of choice
other non-staining developers can work such as HC-110. I only use
Pyrocat-HD now.

I would avoid over exposing film as some recommend, testing is the best
way to determine what works for you.

Good luck,

Don Bryant
Received on Sun Mar 7 18:59:56 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/01/04-02:02:04 PM Z CST