Hey John,
well, i didn't really expect all 600 list members to reply, and in fact, if
they did i would be happy to read all of their thoughts. fact is, of those 600
members i think there is a core group of people who participate in
conversations, so i'm not too worried.
anyway, we're getting off topic. so maybe this thread is fizzling.
cheers,
Steve
Quoting Grafist@aol.com:
> In a message dated 09/03/04 18:03:54 GMT Standard Time, sbell1@artic.edu
> writes:
>
> > and oh yeah, i mentioned temporality. i'd like to hear what you all have to
>
> > say about this.
> ...........................
> Steve, Of course, you must realize you are talking to, writing to, addressing
>
> about six hundred persons on this list. Do you really want the nightmare of
>
> downloading all that stuff, even if only 6% were to answer you?
> I just happen to have an alternative agenda interest in the social
>
> study internet communication aspects of this list whether it be thru photo
> alt or whatever and I find the many kinds of things coming off at a tangent
> from
> photography just as interesting and useful in my studies.
>
> >i know this is a pretty weighted email, please forgive me, i keep quiet for
>
> a
> >while and then explode.
> >cheers,Steve.
>
> As long as you dont IMPLODE, I hope you will be relieved by giving
>
> us more of your thoughts.
> Cheers. John - Photographist
>
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 11 11:43:11 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/01/04-02:02:05 PM Z CST