Re: RES: The Great Scanner debate  - round one

How dense is graphic arts film???
?

Barry Kleider
Photographer. Arts Educator.
612.722.9701
email: bkleider@sihope.com
Web: www.barryphotography.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@silvergrain.org>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: RES: The Great Scanner debate - round one

> From: Ender100@aol.com
> Subject: Re: RES: The Great Scanner debate.AN - round one
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:24:48 -0500 (EST)
>
> > Don't believe those numbers$,1rt(BI have even seen written evaluations
of
> > scanners lend credibility to them.... yikes!
>
> I agree, if you take the log-linear portion of the response, it's
> usually much less.
>
> > the ability to scan film with a log transmissive density of 4.2?
> > uhmmmmm... I wonder what film that was? hehehehehe
>
> Most graphic art films are capable of way beyond such a density.
>
> --
> Ryuji Suzuki
> "All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie." (Bob Dylan 2000)
>
>
Received on Mon Mar 22 08:33:59 2004