Re: RES: The Great Scanner debate  - round one

From: Ryuji Suzuki ^lt;rs@silvergrain.org>
Date: 03/22/04-12:43:04 AM Z
Message-id: <20040322.014304.31634118.lifebook-4234377@silvergrain.org>

From: Ender100@aol.com
Subject: Re: RES: The Great Scanner debate.AN - round one
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:24:48 -0500 (EST)

> Don't believe those numbers$,1rt(BI have even seen written evaluations of
> scanners lend credibility to them.... yikes!

I agree, if you take the log-linear portion of the response, it's
usually much less.

> the ability to scan film with a log transmissive density of 4.2?
> uhmmmmm... I wonder what film that was? hehehehehe

Most graphic art films are capable of way beyond such a density.

--
Ryuji Suzuki
"All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie." (Bob Dylan 2000)
Received on Mon Mar 22 00:44:53 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/01/04-02:02:05 PM Z CST