on 3/28/04 3:16 PM, Sandy King at sanking@clemson.edu wrote:
> You got a very bad sample, which may or may not be related to quality
> control issues. I tested a new box of Efke PL 100 that I received
> from JandC Photo and it was just outstanding, very low B+F and the
> best film for wide expansion and contraction development I have every
> used. The only caveat was that the EFS was actually closer to 50 than
> 100.
> Sandy
Actually I think it was do to customs. The 25 asa (KBR ?) I received was
fine. I have actually been intending to get some 8x10 PL100, and retry it.
Received on Sun Mar 28 15:43:23 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/01/04-02:02:06 PM Z CST