Re: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film

From: Mike Klemmer ^lt;mklemmer@comcast.net>
Date: 05/30/04-12:13:45 PM Z
Message-id: <002501c44671$d8f685a0$0200a8c0@downstairs>

I'm not sure which printer you are using, but with the Epson 2200 printer
and standard inks my experience is exactly the opposite. Using Pictorico
OHP I never have issues with scratched emulsion, and I have been rather
harsh with the negatives at times. I also tested one of the pictorico
negatives by dragging a wet finger across the emulsion, and there was no ink
smearing.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Loris Medici" <loris_medici@yahoo.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film

>
> Mike, in my experience UCF is much better than Pictorico in terms of
> scratching (I'm using pigmented quadtone inks). With Pictorico even a very
> light touch or a minute amount of dampness in sensitizer (very likely to
> happen with not dried enough cyanoype sensitized paper for instance) is
> sufficient to wipe pigment ink off the substrate, with UCF this was not
the
> case: I couldn't damage the image even by strongly scrubbing with my
thumb -
> when I did so, very little ink left the substrate; leaving barely
> perceptible empty dots far to each others... like some sort of flaking).
> Moreover, UCF is 1/2 stop faster than Pictorico (for Cyanotype - I yet
have
> to test speed with Van Dyke and Kallitype) and this is very nice to me!
>
> You're probably printing on the wrong side; in my sample (100 pieces of
> 11x17") the coating is on the convex side - determining the coated side is
> easy, slightly wet the tip of your finger and rub gently on one side. If
it
> sticks and leaves a smudge/mark then this is the coated side, if it slides
> without difficulty and doesn't leave a mark then it's the back side.
>
> I don't know about the stripes; I don't have these... but if you continue
to
> have them exactly the same way after rotating the substrate then it's
> probably something about the paper rollers (damaging the coating and/or
> spreading something onto the film?)... Hope you'll overcome this problem -

> ask support from both Photo Warehouse and Epson.
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mike Klemmer
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film
>
>
> I printed out another sample with the media rotated 90 degrees, and got an
> identical pattern. This time I also got a bunch of random ink smears as
> well.
>
> Roller marks seem to be the culprit here. I then used a wet finger to
> double check that I had printed on the right side. In the process I
noticed
> that the wet finger wiped the printed ink right off the substrate! Also
> this film it is extremely sensitive to scratching like I've never seen on
> Pictorico.
>
> Someone double check me that I have the right film here. I am using the
> Ultrafine Inkjet Crystal Clear 4mil overlay film. Cat# 758-11172
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Don Bryant
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 11:23 PM
> Subject: RE: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film
>
>
> Mike,
>
> One more thought, rotate the U.C.F. 90 degrees and make another print. If
> the direction of the stripes rotate I would definitely say you have
> defective material.
>
> Don Bryant
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Mike Klemmer [mailto:mklemmer@comcast.net]
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 11:37 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: Problem with Ultrafine Clear Film
>
> I printed some test curves onto U.C.F. that I recently purchased, Epson
> 2200 printer. I got some weird, splotchy lines on the film. I then
printed
> the same image onto paper to make sure it wasn't a printer
> problem....everything A-OK there. I printed again on the U.C.F. - same
> exact problem.
>
> You can see a sample of the problem here:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2400372
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael Klemmer
>
>
Received on Sun May 30 12:13:58 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 06/04/04-01:20:54 PM Z CST