Keith Gerling wrote:
>
Were you using GCR or
> UCR? It would make a big difference in how "sensible" it would look. I'm
> sorry if this has already been discussed.
The discussion was about the default Photoshop CMYK space, which uses
GCR, which alters color information more than UCR does; UCR removes
color only in neutral areas, whereas GCR removes color throughout the
image. The CMYK separations I showed were made from this default CMYK
space.
> I would never suggest you change your procedure, but I have to say that my
> perception is entirely different. I "see" in CMYK, and the RGB-derived
> negatives always look strange to me.
Yes, you did miss something by not following the entire thread: I've
already said more than once that to those who are used to working in
CMYK, I'm sure the CMYK separations make sense in a way they don't make
sense to me, and that I am not saying that I think everyone should use
RGB. To quote myself: "I prefer the RGB negatives; others may prefer
CMYK; I don't think there's a right or wrong to this."
kt
Received on Wed Nov 3 10:38:37 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/08/04-10:51:32 AM Z CST