Réf. : copyjet film.

Reply-To: "philippe berger" <mineurdecharbon@skynet.be>
X-PMX-Version: 4.6.1.107272, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.2.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.11.12.6
X-PerlMx-Spam: GaugeIIIIIII, Probability7%, Report'__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT_INCREDIMAIL 0'

Hi,
 
I use for my Epson C84 the jetink Transparency 3M CG 3420
Very very Good
 
What is the name of your sofware for translated
I am Belgian
Are you a link
 
Philippe
 
-------Message original-------
 
De : alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Date : Saturday, November 13, 2004 09:23:15
A : FOTO ALTERNATIVA LISTA DE CORREO
Sujet : copyjet film.
 
Hello,
I am proving the movie copyjet for my diginegatives and when I look at the
low diginegative a magnifying glass, they can be appreciated perfectly you
line them of impression of my old Epson Stylus 600. This effect was not
appreciated when it used my old movie for diginegatives Staedtler.
My question is: because this can happen?.
 
Pardon for my English, text translated by computer.
 
 
.
Received on Sat Nov 13 02:31:23 2004