Re: Film without an antihalation backing

From: Alex Swain ^lt;fotoobscura@gmail.com>
Date: 11/23/04-08:35:07 AM Z
Message-id: <7d43074e041123063579ec48b0@mail.gmail.com>

Gigabit has an amazingly thin and seemingly useless one.

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:38:46 -0500, Christina Z. Anderson
<zphoto@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Check Maco film. They have an infrared film that does have an antihalation
> backing, but they were also coming out a while back with one that
> doesn't--can't remember the name, but they have a website online you could
> look up. Oh, it could be "Aura".
> Chris
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jordan Lee" <jlee@jordanleephotography.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:36 PM
> Subject: Film without an antihalation backing
>
> >I was just wondering if anyone knew of a film that is made without the
> >antihalation backing. Because I have limited resources, 35mm would be
> >preferable. I've done some searches and all I can seem to find is aerial
> >film with doesn't seen to come it the size I'm looking for. Any help would
> >be greatly appreciated.
> > Thanks,
> > Jordan
> >
>
>

-- 
Cheers,
Alex Swain (fo)
http://www.zoom.sh
Received on Tue Nov 23 08:36:40 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/08/04-10:51:34 AM Z CST