Re: Film without an antihalation backing

From: Richard Knoppow ^lt;dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
Date: 11/23/04-08:10:35 AM Z
Message-id: <24210643.1101219035675.JavaMail.root@thecount.psp.pas.earthlink.net>

-----Original Message-----
From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@bellsouth.net>
Sent: Feb 23, 2005 4:38 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Film without an antihalation backing

Check Maco film. They have an infrared film that does have an antihalation
backing, but they were also coming out a while back with one that
doesn't--can't remember the name, but they have a website online you could
look up. Oh, it could be "Aura".
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jordan Lee" <jlee@jordanleephotography.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 10:36 PM
Subject: Film without an antihalation backing

>I was just wondering if anyone knew of a film that is made without the
>antihalation backing. Because I have limited resources, 35mm would be
>preferable. I've done some searches and all I can seem to find is aerial
>film with doesn't seen to come it the size I'm looking for. Any help would
>be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Jordan
>

  Kodak High Speed Infra-Red film does not have an anti-halation backing. It is currently available in 35mm size.

Richard Knoppow
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Received on Tue Nov 23 08:10:52 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/08/04-10:51:34 AM Z CST