Re: Another Ziatype question

Jeffrey

I work on about 25 papers and tested about 300 hundreds. I don't even
finish to test paper as I always find a new and interesting paper.
On some of them the use of more concentrated solution work but when a paper
is well prepared It bring nothing. So in some case it is easier to use a
more concentrate soltuion, but some paper are so buffered that they really
need an acid bath.

Also some of the paper need a slight sizing to turn excellent.

We need all these solution to create fine print. And sometime I ever need
all this solution to turn a paper good.

Amicalement
best regards

Nzé Christian
mailto:christian_nze@hotmail.com
http://www.c-nze.com

>From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@att.net>
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Subject: Re: Another Ziatype question
>Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:21:20 -0400
>
>nze christian wrote:
>>...
>>Jeffrey, I find no use by using more concentrated solution of Palladium,
>>it don't yeld better Dmax. I give a try to your formula for zia and with
>>my paper Cot 320 and Buxton there is no difference . It surely work with
>>some paper but with good paper even a more dilute solution work.
>>...
>
>I have also found different papers to require a different threshold of
>chemistry. However I would not suggest limiting working to the paper which
>uses the least amount of chemistry as the paper selection provides many
>options for the final presentation of the image. Although I do tend to
>gravitate toward my favorite papers and fabric.
>
>--
>Jeffrey D. Mathias
>http://home.att.net/~jeffrey.d.mathias/
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Actions Solidaires : http://www.msn.fr/actionssolidaires/ la
solidarité à portée de click
Received on Tue Oct 12 07:05:44 2004