Gordon sagely wrote:
> I disagree with Sandy. Why should I force people to buy into services
> they don't need just because people can't follow directions?
> What if there were numerous image files sent everyday? What if people
> replied to messages with large image files and sent the image files
> back and forth.
The overhead in reply messages alone in which the reply-er forgot to delete
the attachment would sink the list.
> Are people willing to pay for the cost attachments would incur? I
> would assume not. The choices are:
> no attachments with free archiving
> attacments with a subscription fee and an advertising backed archive
> attachments and no archive.
If we are being invited to vote, here's mine: TEXT ONLY. NO HTML. NO
ATTACHMENTS.
Best regards,
etienne
Received on Wed Sep 1 22:01:36 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/01/04-09:17:54 AM Z CST