Re: Rothko and permanence

From: Pam Niedermayer ^lt;pam@pinehill.com>
Date: 09/12/04-01:41:15 PM Z
Message-id: <4144A65B.4090807@pinehill.com>

What does "cannot be shown" mean?

Pam

Katharine Thayer wrote:

> ...
>
>But while we're talking about Rothko, I think it merits a moment to
>think about the fact that much of Rothko's work, created no more than
>30-60 years ago, has lost its magic and cannot be shown....
>
>
Received on Sun Sep 12 13:41:12 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/01/04-09:17:55 AM Z CST