Mark -
This is certainly good news. I am looking forward to getting a new printer and
hopefully being more successful with the negaitves.
Cheers -
george
--- Ender100@aol.com wrote:
> George,
> a lot of the earlier printers did not use inks with enough density to get
> good digital negatives. All the new printers do have enough density with
> the
> inks. The 1280 is a good buy right now and the dye inks have plenty of
> density
> for digital negatives-more so even than the newer Ultrachromes.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Mark Nelson
> Purchase the eBook & System for Your Own Custom Workflow@
> Precision Digital Negatives
> PDN's Own 31-Step Tablet Now Available—produced by Stouffer Industries
> Credit Card & Paypal now accepted
> www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
> Workshop info on Home Page
>
> In a message dated 4/8/05 8:31:00 AM, glsmyth@yahoo.com writes:
>
>
> > I have not had the success others have seen with digital negatives, as I
> > have
> > not been able to get the Dmax necessary to result in good prints. I am
> > using
> > Pictorico film with an old Epson printer and am thinking that perhaps the
> > problem is with the printer and ink I am using.
> >
> > As I am beginning to have my own problems with my printer, it is time to
> > look
> > at a replacement.
> >
> > I am assuming that the Epson 1280 works well for digital negatives. Are
> you
> > using a special ink or does "regular" ink work?Â
> >
> > Cheers -
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Handmade Photographic Images - http://www.GLSmyth.com
DRiP Investing - http://DRiPInvesting.org
__________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest
Received on Fri Apr 8 12:58:24 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/13/05-09:23:11 AM Z CST