RE: gum dot test - Crawford

From: Kate M ^lt;kateb@paradise.net.nz>
Date: 08/04/05-12:59:42 AM Z
Message-id: <000501c598c2$17c019b0$f526f6d2@kateiwpiarptn6>

Dear John, your question about the dot tests excites me strangely.
Should you do the test and actually manage to get any useful information
out of it, can I marry you??? I will be waiting with bated breath to see
if you reply......
 
One who tried the test, and failed
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Brewer [mailto:john@glossyormatt.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2005 11:24 a.m.
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: gum dot test - Crawford

Hello list
 
I'm about to do the dot test en masse as on page 211 in Keepers of the
Light. Watercolour pigment is given in length of 3.8cm or 1 1/2" but
there is no mention of tube weight. Pigments I want too test range from
5ml (0.17 US fl oz) to 37ml (1.25 US fl oz) and the exit holes of the
tubes vary in diameter, so a 3.8cm length doesn't mean much. Can anyone
enlighten me on either the tube weight Crawford used or give me a sample
weight as a starting point.
 
Many thanks
 
John.

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 3/08/2005
-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 3/08/2005
 
Received on Fri Aug 5 12:37:28 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 09/01/05-09:17:19 AM Z CST