Re: Pictorico Bummer

From: Ender100@aol.com
Date: 08/19/05-09:49:05 PM Z
Message-id: <c8.655f143e.30380231@aol.com>

Sandy,

Boy that is a bummer—are you sure you don't have 2 sheets stuck together?

I bought a bunch of it quite some time ago in both 8.5 x11 and 13 x 19 , so I
am still going through that stock.

Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives

In a message dated 8/19/05 8:49:49 PM, sanking@clemson.edu writes:

> I just opened a new box of 13X19" Pictorico and made a negative this
> evening. I noticed that the stock was quite a bit thicker than the
> previous stock of 13X19" material that I had been using so I decoded
> to take a reading of the UV base with my densitometer. It measures a
> full log .20 more than the old stock, .16 versus .37.
>
> What a pain. I have been basing my printing on first making a smaller
> negative on 8.5X11" material and then honing in exposure before
> making a larger one on 13X19", and getting perfect exposures. That is
> now no longer possible due to the change of stock.
>
> Anyone know if the the thickness of the 8.5X11" is still the same?
>
>
> Sandy
>
Received on Fri Aug 19 21:49:27 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 09/01/05-09:17:20 AM Z CST