Re: poster printing

Hey list,

I don't thnk this is a spam.

Do you know that the new driver and software for the Epson 2200 let you
print posters? By just putting the pieces (whatever size you want) together.

Have you check Livick website? I like his posters (he call them "murals")
and many museums like them too.

I haven't seen anybody else doing it on an archaic process and it is not
easy.

Giovanni

----- Original Message -----
From: "Baird, Darryl" <dbaird@umflint.edu>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 4:40 PM
Subject: RE: poster printing

> Judy (and Kerik),
> OK, yes it was curt and rude. But I don't tend to cite or correct the
> behaviour of others often, only when an opinion (or worse a factoid)
> is submitted which I feel needs addressing. I gave up on the list's
> etiquette back in 1998 (?) -- the time you left (and I followed) the
> list. It won't really ever change enough to suit me or (I suspect) you
> either. I'll tolerate a lot of guff and such as long as the people
> have something worthy to contribute.
>
> Ya know, there are a lot of people on the list I've met in person
> (like you and Kerik) and so far, they're nicer and friendlier face to
> face. I think it's the cloaking effect of the communication form --
> aka the INTERNET.
>
> Darryl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
> Sent: Sun 8/28/2005 4:24 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: RE: poster printing
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Baird, Darryl wrote:
>
> > ... the newest
> > phenomenon to emerge on the Internet is just this type of unethical
> > usage known as "comment spam" which seeks to drive page ranking
> stats
> > higher on a given site in order to appear nearer the top of Google
> > (and other's) search list. It has become the latest bad boy (& girl)
> > behaviour on the web and it mostly seen on BLOG sites. One of my
> > favorites (film and culture) BLOG sites has suffered recently from
> > these innocuous comments which ALWAYS have links to other sites,
> which
> > ALWAYS are unrelated in any way to the BLOG content.
> >
> > Unless the original poster returns to clarify, I would have to be
> very
> > suspicious of this post. HELL, I'M JUST VERY SUSPICIOUS OF
> > EVERYTHING...
>
> What I found inappropriate, the part that provoked me to protest,
> wasn't
> so much the suspicion (though I admit that was a surprise, and given
> the
> later info becomes more plausible) as the vulgarity that came with
> it....
>
> QUOTE:
>
> >> Well John, since you asked, I can think of a much better place for
> > you to
> >> stick this message...
>
> Sandy, Peter, Darryl, et al... Doesn't that abuse, or degrade, the
> entire
> list -- whether or not the suspicion is correct? There have been
> plenty
> of times when someone was out of line (ahem, not to name names, but it
>
> *does* happen). Or let's say, what if *I* had said those words, or
> even
> "shove it"? There would be calls coast to coast for the EMS... In
> fact,
> if memory serves, as recently as Spring, 2005, I was told to "shut my
> mouth" for explaining in polite, logical terms in standard English (I
> like
> to think even *educated* English) that I'd been misinterpreted.
>
> Yet you fellas rush to defend the suspicion, not address the
> vulgarity. I
> repeat: rush to defend the suspicion, not address the gratuitous
> vulgarity.
>
> Maybe this *is* the "boy" mind? AKA "double standard" -- or .... what?
>
> Judy
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Darryl Baird
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
> > Sent: Sat 8/27/2005 11:11 PM
> > To: Kerik
> > Cc: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca;
> > alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca
> > Subject: RE: poster printing
> >
> >
> > The following is uncalled for and mistaken, not to mention
> > gratuitously
> > vulgar. It does no credit to either the writer or the list, in fact
> is
> >
> > degrading to both.
> >
> > The e-mail was not Spam, but a polite and honest question,
> > even if naive and/or misplaced.
> >
> > Where are the vigilant & valiant "list minders" and other concerned
> > list
> > citizens so energetic in defending the list from "the left"? What
> > about
> > from "left field"?
> >
> > What is kerik@kerik smoking?
> >
> > J.
> >
> > On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Kerik wrote:
> >
> >> Great. Now we get spam to the listserve.
> >>
> >> Well John, since you asked, I can think of a much better place for
> > you to
> >> stick this message...
> >>
> >>
> >> From: john stone [mailto:johnstone1001@yahoo.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 11:15 AM
> >> To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
> >> Subject: poster printing
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I just bought a new camera 8MP and I am so excited to start
> > shooting
> >> photos. Now that I have enough pixels I want to make posters out of
> > the good
> >> ones and I have looked at http://www.printrates.com for prices for
> > 20X30
> >> prints and I see it varies from like $10 to almost $30 - what a
> > difference!
> >> any suggestions for a which of the cheaper services is also good
> > quality?
> >> lilke pephoto.com is cheapest at around $10 but any experience with
> > them?
> >>
> >> I hope this is the right forum for this if not i'd like to know
> > where a
> >> better place is.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _____
> >>
> >> Start
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=34442/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>
> > your
> >> day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sun Aug 28 15:45:09 2005