Baird, Darryl wrote:
> Hands down, the Canon 20D, with 17-85mm... from a long-time Nikon
> user.
>
> It cab be simple or complicated, depending on your use. The (free)
> Photoshop raw format plug-in is remarkable for the level(s) of
> control.
>
> Hard to take a bad photograph with this camera. In fact, it's hard to
> purposefully make a 'bad' photograph... like night shots with mixed
> lighting. The white balance is too darn good.
>
> -Darryl Baird
>
Exactly the same would apply to the Nikon D70, which has the advantage
of being cheaper. Don't forget with these cameras you will need to add
the cost of a CF card too, a 1Gb would be useful with either. Both of
them are more to carry around than a Coolpix etc, but can give better
results. Some things - like close-ups - will need extras with the D70 or
the 20D though.
Photoshop isn't free, so unless you already own a copy would add
considerably to your costs. Adobe Elements 3 gets you the same raw
converter rather more cheaply.
Regards,
-- Peter Marshall petermarshall@cix.co.uk +44 (0)1784 456474 31 Budebury Rd, STAINES, Middx, TW18 2AZ, UK _________________________________________________________________ My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/ London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/ The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/ and elsewhere......Received on Sun Feb 13 16:41:15 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/01/05-02:06:54 PM Z CST