Re: Correction !: ULF lens wanted

From: Nick Zentena ^lt;zentena@sympatico.ca>
Date: 02/16/05-07:30:45 AM Z
Message-id: <200502160830.45926.zentena@sympatico.ca>

On Tuesday 15 February 2005 21:14, Judy Seigel wrote:

> commented on the "wide angle" were (as usual) right ! He says it's
> actually 30 inches (THIRTY? Can a lens be 30 inches long that isn't on
> Mount Palomar?), though the six to eight hundred milimeter figure was
> correst.

  For example:

  
http://www.badgergraphic.com/search_product2.asp?x=4161

Over 40". To give you an idea on size the #3 shutter needs a hole less then
3".

        Nick
Received on Wed Feb 16 07:31:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/01/05-02:06:54 PM Z CST