Re: Bad Martha

A lot of snow, eh. You're a poor landscape photographer, then? Certainly no fun, is it,
living where, in Buffalo?

On 22 Jan 2005 at 22:17, Argon3@aol.com wrote:

Date sent: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:17:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Argon3@aol.com
Subject: Re: Bad Martha
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Send reply to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

> As to a discussion of Martha Stewart being off-topic...I beg to
> differ!
>
> I have consulted the index volume to Martha Stewart Living Magazine
> 1990-1999 and listed under "sunprints" is a reference to the May 1997
> issue, page 51. (I thought that I remembered an article on
> cyanotypes somewhere back there.)
>
> The volume in question is not immediately available to me as it has
> been stored in the special fireproof and blastproof archive area down
> in my cellar so that the wisdom of Martha may be kept safe in the
> event of any unfortunate catastrophe that might befall civilization
> and which will necessitate the rebuilding of a tasteful and
> well-organized way of life in the aftermath.
>
> It is, as we say, a good thing.
>
> best
>
> argon
>
Received on Sun Jan 23 01:31:01 2005