Re: RIP kwik-print?

From: David & Jan Harris ^lt;david.j.harris2@ntlworld.com>
Date: 01/25/05-05:55:39 AM Z
Message-id: <001a01c502d4$cb68ea20$579e6751@sotera>

I believe that Rockland markets something similar to Kwik Print, take a look
at http://www.rockaloid.com/selectacolor2.html
I haven't tried it myself.

Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "christopher losee" <rclosee@hotmail.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 7:07 PM
Subject: RIP kwik-print?

> Hi everyone -
>
> Some years ago I studied under Bea Nettles and did an MFA thesis using the
> medium of Kwik Print. I am interested in using this process again, but I
> understand it is no longer commercially available. According to Light
> Impressions, "the inventor [Seymour Rottenburg, I believe] passed away
> recently, and took the process to the grave with him." Quite a dramatic
> exit!
>
> Does anyone know if the formula for making Kwik-Print has ever been made
> available? Has anyone attempted to duplicate (or reverse-engineer) it?
>
> If not, could anyone suggest a comparable process (i.e. one possibly using
> hand-applied colors, capable of being manipulated in local areas as well
as
> overall, perhaps using big litho film with random-dot patterns as negs)?
> Also, perhaps an up-to-date sourcebook and technical manual?
>
> I know, gum bichromate... But can you make a 24x36 print, and achieve the
> tonal range - the bright colors and dark blacks - that you can (once
> could?!!) with Kwik-Print?
>
> I will very much appreciate your suggestions, and I am quite happy to have
> come across this unique list.
>
> --Chris Losee
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
>
Received on Tue Jan 25 05:53:55 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:09 AM Z CST