I don't recall seeing either, but I wasn't looking for those signs...my mind was focusing on the next step...which was kinda silly, considering the slowness of these exposures anyway! Chalk it up to a beginner's lack of familiarity.
Thanks so much for the curves and I will certainly check for solarization and bronzing next run of the respective processes.
Cheers!
JT
-- Judy Rowe Taylor Mukilteo, WA Art is a voice of the heart, a song of the soul. www.enduringibis.com jude.taylor@comcast.net or judyrowetaylor@enduringibis.com > Judy, > > The cyanotype curve on the right of this linked image has worked well > with me for OHP, traditional cyanotype formula, and prints on Cranes > Kids Finish ecru. You might use it as a starting point in deriving your > own curve: > > http://my.net-link.net/~jsmigiel/images/technical/VDB_&_Cyanotype_curves.jpg > > I tried Burkholder's curve too and had to adapt it for my materials. > There is also a pair of curves on the left of the image for van dyke > brownprinting if anyone is interested.) > > I also would repeat that solarization with cyanotypes and bronzing with > POP are indicators of sufficient exposure. Did you see these with your > exposures? > > Joe > > >>> jude.taylor@comcast.net 07/10/05 6:17 PM >>> > I used Dan Burkholder's template; adjustments to the curve will be my > next step in the learning process, along with trying to figure out about > the densitometer options on my scanners' software (I use either the > Polaroid SprintScan 4000 with SilverFast Ai or an Epson 3170 to scan > 35mm film.). > > Thanks! JT > > -- > Judy Rowe Taylor > Mukilteo, WA > Art is a voice of the heart, a song of the soul. > www.enduringibis.com > jude.taylor@comcast.net or judyrowetaylor@enduringibis.com > > > > Judy, > > I don't remember that you mentioned using a curve on your > diginegs--do > > you? The tombstone? marker? image looks like the curve needs > adjustment. I > > say this because getting the curve nearly right gave me the most > trouble. > > And I say nearly 'cause it isn't exact yet, but every time I think I > have > > improved it the prints turn out worse. > > Charles > > >Received on Sun Jul 10 20:37:24 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 08/25/05-05:31:51 PM Z CST