DEAR SUSAN,
           Dunno. Living in Barbados we don’t have access to Kodachrome. Perhaps someone from NA or UK could answer.
                       CHEERS!
                                 BOB
 Please check my website: http://www.bobkiss.com/ <http://www.bobkiss.com/>
-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Huber [mailto:shuber@ssisland.com]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 8:08 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Silly little Kodak History question.
Hi Bob,
I thought the Kodachrome has been phased out? Is it still in production?
Susan
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Maxey <mailto:written_by@msn.com>
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca <mailto:alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: Silly little Kodak History question.
>>>If you shot your Kodachrome 25 with good optics, project them on a LARGE
white wall using a decent projector lens, and walk up to the wall you will
see detail and separation that you never see in reproduction. It is an
amazing film.>>>
Absolutely true.
Whenever Kodak introduced a new film, I/we would always project the slides. I would shoot a few rolls in stereo and the film's "faults" would be immediately apparent. Grain and sharpness simply cannot hide when viewed in stereo.
That is how I can confidently state for a fact that Kodachrome 25 is better than K-64; that Kodachrome is better than Ektachrome.
Bob is correct, projection always tells the tale. After all, slides are designed for projection, not printing.
Bob
…
_____
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
_____
Block Spam Emails - Click here! <http://promos.hotbar.com/promos/promodll.dll?RunPromo&El=&SG=&RAND=13495&partner=fastutility>
Received on Fri Jul 15 06:46:39 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 08/25/05-05:31:51 PM Z CST