Re: Why Winsor & Newton?

You would think Steven Livick might have some information.

Wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Editor P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: Why Winsor & Newton?

> Editor P.O.V. Image Service wrote:
>
> > Katharine Thayer wrote:
> >
> >> Eric Neilsen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Where is Wilhelm in all of this? Has he tested any of the pigments
> >>> applied
> >>> as "intended" or within a gum print?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Don't I wish! But I don't think so..... it seems unlikely that they
> >> would be interested in this, as so very few people are involved with
gum
> >> printing. kt
> >>
> >>
> > Henry tests ONLY what he is paid by manufacturers to test. Nuff said?
>
> I should have added: "..and only publishes results when explicitly
> authorized by those same manufacturers."
> Keith
>
>
> Keith Krebs
>
> "Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer
> User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo
> Publications), at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
> and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers
> "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together
> guys"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sat Jun 4 18:53:25 2005