Re: Slowest Commercial Film Available?

From: Alex Swain ^lt;fotoobscura@gmail.com>
Date: 03/07/05-07:40:50 AM Z
Message-id: <7d43074e05030705404e25877e@mail.gmail.com>

my god that is slow. Thats the published speed of the film?

wow. gotta play with that stuff more.

-- 
Cheers,
Alex Swain (fo)
Burlington, VT
http://www.zoom.sh
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:53:42 +0100, Breukel, C. (HKG) <C.Breukel@lumc.nl> wrote:
> JD,
> 
> A bit late her, but in my hands: MACO 820 IR (depending on the red filter ofcourse, in my case a 70 filter), 1.5-3 asa.
> and APH lith film, processed in LC1 for cont. tone 1.5 asa,
> 
> best,
> 
> Cor
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Sumner [mailto:jdos2@mindspring.com]
> > Sent: vrijdag 4 maart 2005 17:21
> > To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> > Subject: Slowest Commercial Film Available?
> >
> >
> > Anyone have experience with the slowest commonly available film, or
> > information how to pull process further any film below the
> > recommended
> > Ilford Pan F 25ASA? 120/220, 135 and sheet film emulsions are
> > what I'd
> > be using.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > JD
> >
> >
>
Received on Mon Mar 7 07:41:15 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/08/05-09:31:00 AM Z CST