Shannon Stoney wrote:
>
> Katherine wrote:
>
I take it that no
> >one knows what happened to the original print that the copy negative was
> >taken of.
>
> I saw it.
If by "it" you mean you saw the original, that's unlikely. The three
prints in Stieglitz's collection, at the Met, are all these
second-generation prints made from the copy negative, as I explained
before.
kt
Received on Mon Oct 31 18:41:29 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 11/07/05-09:46:19 AM Z CST