On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Katharine Thayer wrote:
> It wasn't a day or two later, but more like a month or two later as I
> recall, that I had what *I* thought was a similar episode, and
> unfortunately I wrote to the list right away and said that since I'd
> had a similar episode without the glutaraldehyde, I had to assume that
> it wasn't the glutaraldehyde that caused the first one. But when I saw
> my doctor, he said that the two episodes were very different, not the
> same at all, and that he was absolutely convinced that the first one was
> a toxic reaction to glutaraldehyde. Like I said the other day, I'll
> never use the stuff again no matter how great it turns out to be, and
> yes, at least as far as my doctor is concerned, and I have to assume he
> knows what he's talking about, it was the glutaraldehyde.
If this is the case, it was one of those times I didn't get mail that went
to the list (as a couple of messages today are fully mysterious -- I
didn't get the antecedents). Re this episode, I received only the first,
describing the scary effects, and the seeming retraction, saying it was
something else.
J.
Received on Mon Sep 5 21:35:55 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/18/05-01:13:00 PM Z CST